NATO`s Chicago Summit: A Thorny Agenda
Reaserch Paper by Karl-Heinz Kamp
An Agenda for NATO-Russia Cooperation on Nonproliferation
The media has a tendency to highlight any possible difference of view between NATO and Russia and to recall the old Cold War saying that, “What is bad for Washington is good for Moscow.” This framing is both untrue and counterproductive. In today’s world and even more so in the future, Russia and NATO members will have ever more reasons to cooperate on economic and security issues.
Article by Pierre Goldschmidt
NO Sandy, Saharan Grave for NATO
By the end of March 2011, NATO had officially assumed command of all three elements of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 on Libya: an arms embargo, a no-fly zone and actions to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas under the threat of attack.
Article by Gareth Chappell
NATO after Libya
A year ago, in an article published at the Center for European Policy Analysis, we argued that “some voices increasingly insist that the age of Homo Atlanticus is declining. Though the trans-Atlantic relationship will face numerous crucial challenges in the future, the ‘Atlantic man,’ an unquestionable pillar of NATO, will still play an essential role."
Article by Dominik P. Jankowski and Col. Tomasz K. Kowalik
| PUBLICATIONS |
MEDIA MONITORING | BACKGROUND READING | TIMELINE |
